[PATCH] svfwscanf: Simplify _sungetwc_r to eliminate apparent buffer overflow
Keith Packard <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.newlib |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
svfwscanf replaces getwc and ungetwc_r. The comments in the code talk about avoiding file operations, but they also need to bypass the mbtowc calls as svfwscanf operates on wchar_t, not multibyte data, which is a more important reason here; they would not work correctly otherwise. The ungetwc replacement has code which uses the 3 byte FILE _ubuf field, but if wchar_t is 32-bits, this field is not large enough to hold even one wchar_t value. Building in this mode generates warnings about array overflow: In file included from ../../newlib/libc/stdio/svfiwscanf.c:35: ../../newlib/libc/stdio/vfwscanf.c: In function '_sungetwc_r.isra': ../../newlib/libc/stdio/vfwscanf.c:316:12: warning: array subscript 4294967295 is above array bounds of 'unsigned char[3]' [-Warray-bounds] 316 | fp->_p = &fp->_ubuf[sizeof (fp->_ubuf) - sizeof (wchar_t)]; | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In file included from ../../newlib/libc/stdio/stdio.h:46, from ../../newlib/libc/stdio/vfwscanf.c:82, from ../../newlib/libc/stdio/svfiwscanf.c:35: ../../newlib/libc/include/sys/reent.h:216:17: note: while referencing '_ubuf' 216 | unsigned char _ubuf[3]; /* guarantee an ungetc() buffer */ | ^~~~~ However, the vfwscanf code *never* ungets data before the start of the scanning operation, and *always* ungets data which matches the input at that point, so the code always hits the block which backs up over the input data and never hits the block which uses the _ubuf field. In addition, the svfwscanf code will always start with the unget buffer empty, so the ungetwc replacement never needs to support an unget buffer at all. Simplify the code by removing support for everything other than backing up over the input data, leaving the check to make sure it doesn't get underflowed in case the vfscanf code has a bug in it. Signed-off-by: Keith Packard <[email protected]> -- -keith
0001-svfwscanf-Simplify-_sungetwc_r-to-eliminate-apparent.patch
(text/x-diff, 3.8 KB)
From 2bbbf24fab03472b73296356b7dfb13d616302e9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Keith Packard <[email protected]> Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2021 11:51:52 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] svfwscanf: Simplify _sungetwc_r to eliminate apparent buffer overflow svfwscanf replaces getwc and ungetwc_r. The comments in the code talk about avoiding file operations, but they also need to bypass the mbtowc calls as svfwscanf operates on wchar_t, not multibyte data, which is a more important reason here; they would not work correctly otherwise. The ungetwc replacement has code which uses the 3 byte FILE _ubuf field, but if wchar_t is 32-bits, this field is not large enough to hold even one wchar_t value. Building in this mode generates warnings about array overflow: In file included from ../../newlib/libc/stdio/svfiwscanf.c:35: ../../newlib/libc/stdio/vfwscanf.c: In function '_sungetwc_r.isra': ../../newlib/libc/stdio/vfwscanf.c:316:12: warning: array subscript 4294967295 is above array bounds of 'unsigned char[3]' [-Warray-bounds] 316 | fp->_p = &fp->_ubuf[sizeof (fp->_ubuf) - sizeof (wchar_t)]; | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In file included from ../../newlib/libc/stdio/stdio.h:46, from ../../newlib/libc/stdio/vfwscanf.c:82, from ../../newlib/libc/stdio/svfiwscanf.c:35: ../../newlib/libc/include/sys/reent.h:216:17: note: while referencing '_ubuf' 216 | unsigned char _ubuf[3]; /* guarantee an ungetc() buffer */ | ^~~~~ However, the vfwscanf code *never* ungets data before the start of the scanning operation, and *always* ungets data which matches the input at that point, so the code always hits the block which backs up over the input data and never hits the block which uses the _ubuf field. In addition, the svfwscanf code will always start with the unget buffer empty, so the ungetwc replacement never needs to support an unget buffer at all. Simplify the code by removing support for everything other than backing up over the input data, leaving the check to make sure it doesn't get underflowed in case the vfscanf code has a bug in it. Signed-off-by: Keith Packard <[email protected]> --- newlib/libc/stdio/vfwscanf.c | 40 +++--------------------------------- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-) diff --git a/newlib/libc/stdio/vfwscanf.c b/newlib/libc/stdio/vfwscanf.c index f00d41a09..e9e00dfec 100644 --- a/newlib/libc/stdio/vfwscanf.c +++ b/newlib/libc/stdio/vfwscanf.c @@ -272,49 +272,15 @@ _sungetwc_r (struct _reent *data, /* After ungetc, we won't be at eof anymore */ fp->_flags &= ~__SEOF; - /* - * If we are in the middle of ungetwc'ing, just continue. - * This may require expanding the current ungetc buffer. + /* All ungetwc usage in scanf un-gets the current character, so + * just back up over the string if we aren't at the start */ - - if (HASUB (fp)) - { - if (fp->_r >= fp->_ub._size && __submore (data, fp)) - { - return EOF; - } - fp->_p -= sizeof (wchar_t); - *fp->_p = (wchar_t) wc; - fp->_r += sizeof (wchar_t); - return wc; - } - - /* - * If we can handle this by simply backing up, do so, - * but never replace the original character. - * (This makes swscanf() work when scanning `const' data.) - */ - - if (fp->_bf._base != NULL && fp->_p > fp->_bf._base - && ((wchar_t *)fp->_p)[-1] == wc) + if (fp->_bf._base != NULL && fp->_p > fp->_bf._base) { fp->_p -= sizeof (wchar_t); fp->_r += sizeof (wchar_t); - return wc; } - /* - * Create an ungetc buffer. - * Initially, we will use the `reserve' buffer. - */ - - fp->_ur = fp->_r; - fp->_up = fp->_p; - fp->_ub._base = fp->_ubuf; - fp->_ub._size = sizeof (fp->_ubuf); - fp->_p = &fp->_ubuf[sizeof (fp->_ubuf) - sizeof (wchar_t)]; - *(wchar_t *) fp->_p = wc; - fp->_r = 2; return wc; } -- 2.32.0
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 832 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEw4O3eCVWE9/bQJ2R2yIaaQAAABEFAmEcCc0ACgkQ2yIaaQAA ABEBKRAAh4KPGL934f+sD2+auzAG8iERGoTNiNjvOh0eY3v4fFEV41MByOuUMWIG Lz9Xksiuun5dpM/2aPlQPHwnPVipYBvjqEUwA6PGJMKezF2/2rnX4HMEBVuoMF37 otE+rwJRnKHudSxBSzGIiQlj7mihvErlJ2GqTKujp/csWqyPdFfSRrtFGwAp7Xfs hi6T+ubH46cJvJOVDqCkoPb/ldA3ahUHnbx5+D2bNe8XdywQxYYaaYBNL01vSkAu yVm7JIu8NRS6aUKUQfNkQ8mQA+/G2M3cOybFCRwvQcj8gJwAm3xJnvwBSGOV0J2h eP3c/UrXXqn9hLGAfRh3FntWWsJ8wG3JQOccIUS4+r7KzOxy2TkmUVAYeRFdI9yB rTYMQUKOKb0P5LBi6dlYc194Nc1IXgJcmR34JkPifN/5vRw5GgJ68A9TSIFylLRt rMRcrhAPNtRxY/uQLCvx3xO+G6jsekB7tLMoo7nksyzoC66aKqY5go9N4ILp4Vt3 SO0ed1ZR3/0Wt9H10VX6i+8T5i0ma/tLLSxkXEInRHbz2XHoEHsIYXJ+kx1rxBX7 pa8g/Zrk0uGJcoDbo/E6Vmh6gjId9BGoPQctAwQemF6C+pkzIwxtATUuQWT+w1fe /kum6TxQON/rp7pQ8h306t0/FIXx7ZXapiH3gtA0TNZ1McUbHEE= =Eg/A -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----