Re: [PATCH v2] change _COMPILING_NEWLIB to _LIBC
Corinna Vinschen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.newlib |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Nov 13 00:12, Mike Frysinger wrote: > Use the same name as glibc & gnulib to indicate "newlib itself is > being compiled". This also harmonizes the codebase a bit in that > _LIBC was already used in places instead of _COMPILING_NEWLIB. > > Building for bfin-elf, mips-elf, and x86_64-pc-cygwin produces > the same object code. > --- > v2 > - rebased > > newlib/configure.host | 2 +- > newlib/libc/include/ctype.h | 2 +- > newlib/libc/include/dirent.h | 2 +- > newlib/libc/include/locale.h | 2 +- > newlib/libc/include/reent.h | 2 +- > newlib/libc/include/stdio.h | 12 ++++++------ > newlib/libc/include/sys/_default_fcntl.h | 2 +- > newlib/libc/include/sys/features.h | 2 +- > newlib/libc/include/sys/signal.h | 4 ++-- > newlib/libc/include/sys/stat.h | 4 ++-- > newlib/libc/include/sys/time.h | 2 +- > newlib/libc/include/sys/times.h | 2 +- > newlib/libc/include/sys/unistd.h | 2 +- > newlib/libc/include/sys/wait.h | 2 +- > newlib/libc/machine/cris/sys/fcntl.h | 2 +- > newlib/libc/machine/mips/memcpy.S | 2 +- > newlib/libc/machine/mips/memset.S | 2 +- > newlib/libc/machine/mips/strcmp.S | 2 +- > winsup/cygwin/dir.cc | 2 +- > winsup/cygwin/fhandler_cygdrive.cc | 2 +- > winsup/cygwin/fhandler_dev.cc | 2 +- > winsup/cygwin/fhandler_disk_file.cc | 2 +- > winsup/cygwin/fhandler_proc.cc | 2 +- > winsup/cygwin/fhandler_process.cc | 2 +- > winsup/cygwin/fhandler_procsysvipc.cc | 2 +- > winsup/cygwin/fhandler_registry.cc | 2 +- > winsup/cygwin/include/cygwin/config.h | 6 +++--- > winsup/cygwin/include/cygwin/stat.h | 2 +- > winsup/cygwin/include/cygwin/stdlib.h | 2 +- > winsup/cygwin/include/getopt.h | 2 +- > winsup/cygwin/include/machine/_types.h | 2 +- > winsup/cygwin/include/sys/dirent.h | 2 +- > winsup/cygwin/include/sys/syslimits.h | 2 +- > winsup/cygwin/include/sys/wait.h | 2 +- > winsup/cygwin/math/complex_internal.h | 2 +- > 35 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-) Looks good, please push. Thanks, Corinna