Re: [PATCH v2] newlib: libm: merge build up a directory

Mike Frysinger <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lib.newlib
Message-ID <YhPaLPjMnQ7jpYcE@vapier>
On 21 Feb 2022 18:04, Jon Turney wrote:
> On 21/02/2022 18:00, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On 21 Feb 2022 12:20, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >> On Feb 16 23:42, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >>> Convert all the libm/ subdir makes into the top-level Makefile.  This
> >>> allows us to build all of libm from the top Makefile without using any
> >>> recursive make calls.  This is faster and avoids the funky lib.a logic
> >>> where we unpack subdir archives to repack into a single libm.a.  The
> >>> machine override logic is maintained though by way of Makefile include
> >>> ordering, and source file accumulation in libm_a_SOURCES.
> >>>
> >>> One thing to note is that this will require GNU Make because of:
> >>> 	libm_a_CFLAGS = ... $(libm_a_CFLAGS_$(subst /,_,$(@D)))
> >>> This was the only way I could find to supporting per-dir compiler
> >>> settings, and I couldn't find a POSIX compatible way of transforming
> >>> the variable content.  I don't think this is a big deal as other
> >>> Makefiles in the tree are using GNU Make-specific syntax, but I call
> >>> this out as it's the only one so far in the new automake code that
> >>> I've been writing.
> >>>
> >>> Automake doesn't provide precise control over the output object names
> >>> (by design).  This is fine by default as we get consistent names in all
> >>> the subdirs: libm_a-<source>.o.  But this relies on using the same set
> >>> of compiler flags for all objects.  We currently compile libm/common/
> >>> with different optimizations than the rest.
> >>>
> >>> If we want to compile objects differently, we can create an intermediate
> >>> archive with the subset of objects with unique flags, and then add those
> >>> objects to the main archive.  But Automake will use a different prefix
> >>> for the objects, and thus we can't rely on ordering to override.
> >>>
> >>> But if we leverage $@, we can turn Automake's CFLAGS into a multiplex
> >>> on a per-dir (and even per-file if we wanted) basis.  Unfortunately,
> >>> since $@ contains /, Automake complains it's an invalid name.  While
> >>> GNU Make supports this, it's a POSIX extension, so Automake flags it.
> >>> Using $(subst) avoids the Automake warning to get a POSIX compliant
> >>> name, albeit with a GNU Make extension.
> >>> ---
> >>> v2
> >>> - rebased onto latest tree
> >>> - fixed a parallel build issue with generated newlib headers & libm objects
> >>
> >> This patch breaks Cygwin.  Unfortunately I didn't try to build myself,
> >> but only inspected the patch, so I didn't realize the problem.
> >>
> >> First of all, Cygwin takes libm.a from newlib/libm/, not from newlib.
> >> This is easily fixable.
> >>
> >> However, even after fixing this, we get a link stage error for *all*
> >> fenv functions:
> >>
> >> ld: x86_64-pc-cygwin/newlib/libm.a(libm_a-fenv.o): in function `fegetenv':
> >>    newlib/libm/machine/x86_64/../shared_x86/fenv.c:160:
> >>      multiple definition of `fegetenv';
> >> x86_64-pc-cygwin/newlib/libm.a(libm_a-fegetenv.o):
> >>    newlib/libm/fenv/fegetenv.c:65:
> >>      first defined here
> >>
> >> For some reason, libm.a contains both definitions of the fenv functions,
> >> the x86_64 definitions from newlib/libm/machine/shared_x86, as well as
> >> the fallback definitions from newlib/libm/fenv.
> >>
> >> Can you please take a look?
> > 
> > how do you build cygwin ?  i've just been doing w/newlib-cygwin git checkout:
> > $ ./configure --target=i686-pc-cygwin && make
> > $ ./configure --target=x86_64-pc-cygwin && make
> > these are passing for me
> 
> You'll need to apply this patch:
> 
> https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin-patches/2022q1/011766.html
> 
> Otherwise, you are linking with a stale libm.a left in your builddir 
> from before these changes.

while i often test incremental changes, i `rm -rf` the build dir when running
the full test suite to avoid possible issues like this.  and in this case,
both targets pass from a fresh build.
-mike
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEuQK1JxMl+JKsJRrUQWM7n+g39YEFAmIT2iwACgkQQWM7n+g3
9YETsxAAiwZQnPyhAfDp/JhoVYIOMWOiiLyMhnQ+34BnC5UkNcfeVkP0+OpKzFGx
fpR/0lPX8v/N4rBPH9b5btQwGmbqvvwIJMyw30BdNKn462/wqkdp9buLv94HAwR6
YdeY0lr9iIIdLgo275CrLYZIsJG/wlezQpg/C+0FR0WjBZdcfNCYs6aiIYuKjCYA
fM5VJm9JvFQS6afp2XPsnL+ftX5JYQ83E49xu4gSu4ZuLMVUxi6Q+ND6TE7rWdXt
dh9EaD32IhtT2XurQfQv1z0Sg9nCXNC5xt0ofo5jxaXMgalHRaxeSzrd0GbYVe8Q
JAGj5x1C3ok2IhynmyrFdubAbCQaxjdJxHoa6XWJb/4PYDIokepIOtrzEs7mQJ8v
XfVODFvbakoLIib4p8D1Hp6Q4uQzwUsWLFfKME8S8VETmxKCw7JZ4KBxrknq//5h
ENar7XiIlb69SCFMp+Hq6++NEVRsh/YmdXXtmXKcGFswivvaMEyHjYvBggYg8x1e
+FBuqZ3MskO3bHenyayCxM5Cw/RRPPrx9ZEvjNerKhBIgl9lKsOTk4iXJuUOGnHR
09HKOvTjhzzKxAg++7hYEOhrlo0l7EIwXADY2QCHiiHOqTcxlKBKbHWjtgBNF9Tp
BUBxkZbSuK/dmCB8ncq/0PETPYuR9s+dhUVm6Z2J13WCoUQdN6A=
=GSng
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.