Re: [PATCH v3 6/7] Optional struct _reent::_new::_unused

On May 17 14:57, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 17/05/2022 14:49, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > > > @@ -693,7 +694,8 @@ struct _reent
> > > >    #define _N_LISTS 30
> > > >              unsigned char * _nextf[_N_LISTS];
> > > >              unsigned int _nmalloc[_N_LISTS];
> > > Maybe we should also rename _nextf in _reserved_4 and _nmalloc in
> > > _reserved_5.
> > Right, that would be great.  Feel free to push the patch with this change.
> 
> Ok, what about the entire patch set?

I meant the entire set, sorry for being unclear.


Corinna