Re: [PATCH] libgloss: riscv: Convert to non-recursive automake

On Fri, 26 Aug 2022 07:49:23 PDT (-0700), [email protected] wrote:
> On Aug 23 16:12, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>> PR 29515 points out our documentation builds are broken, let's just move
>> over to the new non-recursive builds.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> I think something as small as adding an empty "html" target could make that bug
>> report go away, but when poking around I couldn't figure out why our
>> Makefile.in was so different.  I ended up running into vapier's build system
>> conversion patches and figured it would be easier to just throw away our
>> current build configuration rather than trying to figure out how it works.
>>
>> This builds for me and the resulting libraries look generally OK, but I don't
>> personally use newlib right now so I don't have anything specific setup for
>> testing.
>>
>> I haven't included the generated files from running autoconf/automake as I'm
>> getting a lot of diff right now due to some version mis-matches on my
>> development box.  If folks like this then I'm happy to sort that out, just
>> figured I'd send something along now to see if this is the right way to go --
>> it's a lot of diff just to make "make html" work, but as far as I can tell the
>> plan is to convert all subdirs over eventually so it seems sane to me.
>
> Pushed with regenerated configurey.

Thanks!