Re: [PATCH] makedocbook: Fix false report of unhandled texinfo command
Mike Frysinger <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.newlib |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <Y1+/XcpYt7wSmD4v@vapier> |
On 31 Oct 2022 09:59, Jon Turney wrote:
i guess the feedback below isn't exactly about new code even if it's relevant ...
> + # fail if there are unhandled texinfo commands
> + match = re.search('(?<!@)@[^@\s]+', s)
regexes should use raw strings (i.e., this is missing the r prefix)
> + if match:
> + print("texinfo command '%s' remains in output" % match.group(), file=sys.stderr)
this is a little dangerous in general as match.group() could return a tuple,
and this would fail. if you want to use %, you should force a tuple.
print("..." % (match.group(),), ...)
> + exit(1)
scripts should never use exit(), only sys.exit(). although i see the current
script gets this wrong in a lot of places.
also you can simplify this -- sys.exit accepts a string that it'll print to
stderr and then exit non-zero.
sys.exit(".....")
-mike
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEuQK1JxMl+JKsJRrUQWM7n+g39YEFAmNfv10ACgkQQWM7n+g3 9YEyMA/+NDGIV1TmjSZvJMoF90jjMvZ4HLe9EWdw6xGnLNi0UBtdvARVYUlzMFIV 66eC1gmo0MclikIZ+6cniw1IsGbTWYPmR/kpxrOdPHUVOmARL3NO2czVEzr/9KOj onNG53SzgJZsWyg/b8MOLWuoAi57QVD/qKNMAPq2VP6Dna06z3ccLmaVp+DSiEvA S5RGxwkeccQ0yBUKN10vO02AIAjRV0ZRrZD6YiCebYwDn49yyrzFqkyiV5HkR5Yu H8WC8A1/eumKTDrgWqJByIasxUOwbcaP9BkzWC2BAoawihGnIUBuzFgFPL4oDzwW /aNKukKUshQ9qg6kgPbZNxedhYrH+FhxGC011LVoBv4NOKPMvrMyOPV9h1bDOYc9 nUXa0qP5HoHP7VDvcAbgR/5kDcZYlFV2JKSXsQH5gWj41oJtesoK+TR2Y+vJnajq of+QBr2xUnDfW6XNKMioSR9EBqXzF/SmewU02Ar9+vWGuapYrjBN710Kx7tyP/WI 4yD5swi/pt5eiTJWm7orgVS6OyFUhVLwaXPj5NQRqF5p94lxBYB06d4LAsW2SmFJ BWhnlq6JAzA4Svmxkabd5+DnD8pjItW+ZTi2zMIbKRTGcp9i1fFp3jxwtUwKdAG7 ufSfDsIAc98Hx6ZVUt5CIJEjEiKQ7FyLCA0915oEPLhE6WRrlZE= =inXn -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----