Re: Generate porting.info in build tree rather than source tree
Mike Frysinger <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.newlib |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <Y2Rc//StgimNQgxW@vapier> |
On 31 Oct 2022 16:10, Torbjorn SVENSSON wrote: > On 2022-10-30 08:12, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On 29 Oct 2022 17:38, Torbjorn SVENSSON wrote: > >> Okay, so in that case, something changed in the newlib build process to > >> generate and install the porting.info file > > > > porting.info is part of libgloss, not newlib. i understand the source tarball > > is packaged overall as "newlib" so it can be a little confusing. > > > > older versions build & install porting.info if you use the install-info target. > > but it wouldn't do it by default. > > Might be so, but not for the default make target (the one I used). What > make target should I use to build everything, just like the build system > did before your improvement, but avoid the .info files? the GNU project provides no such target/config. you can prob cheat by setting MAKEINFO to a stub program. or just build the info pages. i don't see why building them is a problem in the first place. -mike
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEuQK1JxMl+JKsJRrUQWM7n+g39YEFAmNkXP8ACgkQQWM7n+g3 9YGBGg/+IU0mavZBbuE2Zw7on3KhnUR25ChXgd/+gsSEzo/SNBFfHwvCCXRrfCoN fJ0CXabza3oNghQhwpCfbTRvo6pj4DOlSfBr0OLoUwkMSQwjri5dK3bXkGnsyoa9 kQuw0J/4zbnnaqRmAL8/jIeEmxGbVWfkEN0Elz3CSl7tJnNS2Df3HbOszggLVRKM uk62xRBi4EX1KW9feJpKbiOTtCw406lm4KclR/JQzY/dPNGml4EIMzkvvLdOJ9D7 3GYPbUiOp9YlCr3X4rGwWWEXUDS6JA3ANpzpUGJRF7dRt13r2tw4+itPROOiowi4 klqXJv8MUWA4iF0RGsbpFiJDiT3aoitcaKD1LR7fQ/RaRbA2nArhLmMz/cnG22g1 RK6yLERld8WL4qNpufg6dFKA5stpkKdZPORxX50Dt2oBARE9ciefQwRcykX9cdBy UjeDY6+NRrVPoJiRfQ5AvcY+2IcdMIFkpc+Hq4jWj6RMWyuWP7jgytZgR9RSo3WF JkUi1o0TPuxnv9Cm5lCTurFngTskNmejK+Ew8Rb4cmuawGu/ZTihOeKNvgf2f6ET VHE+n13xWLqsbziMOzalcCATV0y46mY16H3bxZZb1PETJh0kz9adqZrGBcr7yv1h yiyxGRCmOBY9u+gqEbcLVCOTh5Ltso+cthiPvr7FAygth/tcpX0= =aPSB -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----