Re: Re: [PATCH] Cygwin: doc: Fix type mismatch in porting.texi

"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lib.newlib
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Thanks a lot Jon, I will adjust it,and git push it again.



[email protected]
 
From: Jon Turney
Date: 2023-03-17 02:55
To: Songhe Zhu; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Cygwin: doc: Fix type mismatch in porting.texi
On 16/03/2023 02:59, Songhe Zhu wrote:
> Issue:newlib/libgloss/doc/porting.texi:570: warning: @ref node name should not contain `.'
>        newlib/libgloss/doc/porting.texi:747: warning: @ref node name should not contain `.'
>        newlib/libgloss/doc/porting.texi:938: warning: @ref node name should not contain `.'
> 
> reproduce:
> git clone https://github.com/riscv-collab/riscv-gnu-toolchain.git
> cd riscv-gnu-toolchain
> ./configure --prefix=`pwd`/install --with-arch=rv64gc --with-abi=lp64d --enable-multilib
> make -j $(nproc)
> 
> The above issue will happen when executing the build command. This patch eliminates these warnings.
> @ref{That},'That' does not contain node;
> I think it's just appropriate to use @file here,
> @file{file-name},'file-name' support node;
> refer:https://www.gnu.org/software/texinfo/manual/texinfo/texinfo.html#g_t_0040file
 
From a brief reading of that, it doesn't appear that @file{} supports 
the 3 argument form, so should the 2nd and 3rd arguments be dropped?
 
This would seem to change the meaning subtly, as it drops the indication 
that the files in Appendix A are examples.
 
Then again, these uses of @ref alone as a sentence are just ungrammatical.
 
So maybe the correct solution is to give those sections names which 
don't contain '.' and/or embed these references into sentences which 
direct the reader to that full example, from which a sample is given 
below (or whatever the documentation is actually trying to say, I'm not 
well versed enough in libgloss to know for sure)
 
> ---
>   libgloss/doc/porting.texi | 6 +++---
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/libgloss/doc/porting.texi b/libgloss/doc/porting.texi
> index 15f214d02..4a269a970 100644
> --- a/libgloss/doc/porting.texi
> +++ b/libgloss/doc/porting.texi
> @@ -567,7 +567,7 @@ and then the ROM takes over. Pick a safe vector with no side
>   effects. Some ROMs have a builtin trap handler just for this case.
>   @end enumerate
>   portable between all the m68k based boards we have here.
> -@ref{crt0.S,,Example Crt0.S}.
> +@file{crt0.S,,Example Crt0.S}.
>   
>   
>   @smallexample
> @@ -744,7 +744,7 @@ check a few critical addresses like @code{start}, @code{bss_end}, and
>   
>   Here's a breakdown of a linker script for a m68k based target board.
>   See the file @code{libgloss/m68k/idp.ld}, or go to the appendixes in
> -the end of the manual. @ref{idp.ld,,Example Linker Script}.
> +the end of the manual. @file{idp.ld,,Example Linker Script}.
>   
>   @smallexample
>   STARTUP(crt0.o)
> @@ -935,7 +935,7 @@ sbrk(). @code{malloc()}, @code{calloc()}, and @code{realloc()} all call
>   @code{sbrk()} at there lowest level. @code{caddr_t} is defined elsewhere
>   as @code{char *}. @code{RAMSIZE} is presently a compile time option. All
>   this does is move a pointer to heap memory and check for the upper
> -limit. @ref{glue.c,,Example libc support code}. @code{sbrk()} returns a
> +limit. @file{glue.c,,Example libc support code}. @code{sbrk()} returns a
>   pointer to the previous value before more memory was allocated.
>   
>   @smallexample
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.