Re: Newlib's .texi docs - outdated version number/date

Brian Inglis <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lib.newlib
Organization Inglis
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 2023-03-30 06:11, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Mar 30 11:16, Tobias Burnus wrote:
>> On 30.03.23 11:07, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>> On Mar 30 09:28, Tobias Burnus wrote:
>>>> Someone over here stumbled over the version/date mismatch between what is shown
>>>> in the libc/libm manuals - and what is the current newlib release.
>>>> ...
>>>> ... Thus, blindly bumping the version/date seems to be at least more
>>>> consistent than not updating it at all.
>>>>
>>>> Thoughts?
>>> Sounds good.  Please send a patch in git format-patch style.
>>
>> Done now.
> 
> Pushed, thanks!
> 
> It would be nice if we could automate this...

How about - there are 2 real \n in the sed commands:

$ grep '@subtitle' lib[cm]/lib[cm].texi
libc/libc.texi:@subtitle Full Configuration
libc/libc.texi:@subtitle @code{libc} 2.5.0
libc/libc.texi:@subtitle December 2016
libm/libm.texi:@subtitle @code{libm} 2.5.0
libm/libm.texi:@subtitle December 2016
$ sed_fmt='/^\(@subtitle\s\).*20[0-9][0-9].*$/s!!\1%(creatordate:format:%F)!
/^\(@subtitle\s@code{lib[cm]}\s\)[1-9]\+[-_.][0-9]\+[-_.][0-9]\+$/s!!\1%(refname:short)!
/^\(@subtitle\s@code{lib[cm]}\s\)newlib-\([1-9]\+[-_.][0-9]\+[-_.][0-9]\+\)$/s!!\1\2!'
$ git tag -l --format="$sed_fmt" 'newlib-[1-9][-_.].[0-9][-_.][0-9]' \
	| tail -n3 | sed -f - -i lib[cm]/lib[cm].texi
$ grep '@subtitle' lib[cm]/lib[cm].texi              libc/libc.texi:@subtitle 
Full Configuration
libc/libc.texi:@subtitle @code{libc} 4.3.0
libc/libc.texi:@subtitle 2023-01-20
libm/libm.texi:@subtitle @code{libm} 4.3.0
libm/libm.texi:@subtitle 2023-01-20
$ sed_fmt='/^\(@subtitle\s\).*20[0-9][0-9].*$/s!!\1%(creatordate:format:%B %Y)!
/^\(@subtitle\s@code{lib[cm]}\s\)[1-9]\+[-_.][0-9]\+[-_.][0-9]\+$/s!!\1%(refname:short)!
/^\(@subtitle\s@code{lib[cm]}\s\)newlib-\([1-9]\+[-_.][0-9]\+[-_.][0-9]\+\)$/s!!\1\2!'
$ git tag -l --format="$sed_fmt" 'newlib-[1-9][-_.][0-9][-_.][0-9]' \
	| tail -n3 | sed -f - -i lib[cm]/lib[cm].texi
$ grep '@subtitle' lib[cm]/lib[cm].texi              libc/libc.texi:@subtitle 
Full Configuration
libc/libc.texi:@subtitle @code{libc} 4.3.0
libc/libc.texi:@subtitle January 2023
libm/libm.texi:@subtitle @code{libm} 4.3.0
libm/libm.texi:@subtitle January 2023

Where to put it: git hook reference-transaction("committed") with stdin matching
'ZEROID REFOID refs/tags/newlib-[1-9]\+[-_.][0-9]\+[-_.][0-9]\+', part of some 
release process, or in a script?

Elsewhere like assuming git in doc/Makefile.inc, or hook for commit of 
newlib/acinclude.m4 with any line matching '^AC_DEFUN([DEF_NEWLIB_.*_VERSION]' 
where value ',[.*]))$' changes would seem to be more problematic.

-- 
Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis              Calgary, Alberta, Canada

La perfection est atteinte                   Perfection is achieved
non pas lorsqu'il n'y a plus rien à ajouter  not when there is no more to add
mais lorsqu'il n'y a plus rien à retirer     but when there is no more to cut
                                 -- Antoine de Saint-Exupéry
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.