Re: Re: [PATCH] newlib: libc: Improved the readability of strcspn with minor optimization
"Xiao Zeng" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.newlib |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
2023-12-15 18:28 Torbjorn SVENSSON <[email protected]> wrote: > >Hello Xiao, > >On 2023-12-15 09:31, Xiao Zeng wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Xiao Zeng <[email protected]> >> --- >> newlib/libc/string/strcspn.c | 6 ++---- >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/newlib/libc/string/strcspn.c b/newlib/libc/string/strcspn.c >> index abaa93ad6..8ac0bf10c 100644 >> --- a/newlib/libc/string/strcspn.c >> +++ b/newlib/libc/string/strcspn.c >> @@ -37,12 +37,10 @@ strcspn (const char *s1, >> for (c = s2; *c; c++) >> { >> if (*s1 == *c) >> - break; >> + goto end; >> } >> - if (*c) >> - break; >> s1++; >> } >> - >> +end: >> return s1 - s; >> } > >Just looking at this small snippet of code, I would say that the >previous code and your suggestion won't do the same thing. > >Do you have unit tests that confirm that the behavior is identical with >the current implementation and your suggested change? > >When I run your suggestion, I get return value 0, but with the current >implementation it's 3 for this call: strspn("129th", "1234567890"). > >Kind regards, >Torbjörn After applying this patch, provide a comparison of assembly code under the risc-v architecture, with default compilation parameters used in both of them: no-patch: --------------------------------------------------------- libc_a-strcspn.o: file format elf64-littleriscv Disassembly of section .text: 0000000000000000 <strcspn>: 0: 00054683 lbu a3,0(a0) 4: 06068263 beqz a3,68 <.L9> 8: 0005c803 lbu a6,0(a1) c: 00050613 mv a2,a0 0000000000000010 <.LVL1>: 10: 02080463 beqz a6,38 <.L14> 0000000000000014 <.L6>: 14: 00058793 mv a5,a1 18: 00080713 mv a4,a6 1c: 00c0006f j 28 <.L5> 0000000000000020 <.L4>: 20: 0007c703 lbu a4,0(a5) 24: 02070863 beqz a4,54 <.L17> 0000000000000028 <.L5>: 28: 00178793 addi a5,a5,1 000000000000002c <.LVL5>: 2c: fee69ae3 bne a3,a4,20 <.L4> 0000000000000030 <.L7>: 30: 40a60533 sub a0,a2,a0 0000000000000034 <.LVL7>: 34: 00008067 ret 0000000000000038 <.L14>: 38: 00164683 lbu a3,1(a2) 3c: 00160613 addi a2,a2,1 40: fe0688e3 beqz a3,30 <.L7> 44: 00164683 lbu a3,1(a2) 48: 00160613 addi a2,a2,1 4c: fe0696e3 bnez a3,38 <.L14> 50: fe1ff06f j 30 <.L7> 0000000000000054 <.L17>: 54: 00164683 lbu a3,1(a2) 58: 00160613 addi a2,a2,1 5c: fa069ce3 bnez a3,14 <.L6> 60: 40a60533 sub a0,a2,a0 0000000000000064 <.LVL13>: 64: 00008067 ret 0000000000000068 <.L9>: 68: 00000513 li a0,0 000000000000006c <.LVL15>: 6c: 00008067 ret --------------------------------------------------------- patch --------------------------------------------------------- libc_a-strcspn.o: file format elf64-littleriscv Disassembly of section .text: 0000000000000000 <strcspn>: 0: 00054683 lbu a3,0(a0) 4: 04068a63 beqz a3,58 <.L2> 8: 0005c803 lbu a6,0(a1) c: 00050613 mv a2,a0 0000000000000010 <.LVL1>: 10: 02080c63 beqz a6,48 <.L14> 0000000000000014 <.L6>: 14: 00058793 mv a5,a1 18: 00080713 mv a4,a6 1c: 00c0006f j 28 <.L5> 0000000000000020 <.L4>: 20: 0007c703 lbu a4,0(a5) 24: 00070a63 beqz a4,38 <.L16> 0000000000000028 <.L5>: 28: 00178793 addi a5,a5,1 000000000000002c <.LVL5>: 2c: fee69ae3 bne a3,a4,20 <.L4> 0000000000000030 <.L7>: 30: 40a60533 sub a0,a2,a0 0000000000000034 <.LVL7>: 34: 00008067 ret 0000000000000038 <.L16>: 38: 00164683 lbu a3,1(a2) 3c: 00160613 addi a2,a2,1 40: fc069ae3 bnez a3,14 <.L6> 44: fedff06f j 30 <.L7> 0000000000000048 <.L14>: 48: 00164683 lbu a3,1(a2) 4c: 00160613 addi a2,a2,1 50: fe069ce3 bnez a3,48 <.L14> 54: fddff06f j 30 <.L7> 0000000000000058 <.L2>: 58: 00000513 li a0,0 000000000000005c <.LVL12>: 5c: 00008067 ret --------------------------------------------------------- After careful comparison, it was found that there are fewer assembly instructions after the patch. Thanks Xiao Zeng