undefined reference to __ssputws_r with --specs=nano.specs
Torbjorn SVENSSON <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.newlib |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, I noticed that a lot of testcases fails when running the GCC testsuite with --specs=nano.specs. Below is an example that fails with --specs=nano.specs: $ /build/13-head-bin/bin/arm-none-eabi-g++ /build/gcc13_src/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/coroutines/pr100611.C -std=c++20 --specs=nosys.specs -o /dev/null --specs=nano.specs /build/13-head-bin/bin/../lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/13.2.1/../../../../arm-none-eabi/bin/ld: /build/13-head-bin/bin/../lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/13.2.1/../../../../arm-none-eabi/lib/libc_nano.a(libc_a-svfwprintf.o): in function `_svfwprintf_r': (.text._svfwprintf_r+0xd8): undefined reference to `__ssputws_r' /build/13-head-bin/bin/../lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/13.2.1/../../../../arm-none-eabi/bin/ld: (.text._svfwprintf_r+0x834): undefined reference to `__ssputws_r' /build/13-head-bin/bin/../lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/13.2.1/../../../../arm-none-eabi/bin/ld: (.text._svfwprintf_r+0x85c): undefined reference to `__ssputws_r' /build/13-head-bin/bin/../lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/13.2.1/../../../../arm-none-eabi/bin/ld: (.text._svfwprintf_r+0x8a8): undefined reference to `__ssputws_r' /build/13-head-bin/bin/../lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/13.2.1/../../../../arm-none-eabi/bin/ld: (.text._svfwprintf_r+0x8dc): undefined reference to `__ssputws_r' /build/13-head-bin/bin/../lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/13.2.1/../../../../arm-none-eabi/bin/ld: /build/13-head-bin/bin/../lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/13.2.1/../../../../arm-none-eabi/lib/libc_nano.a(libc_a-svfwprintf.o):(.text._svfwprintf_r+0x900): more undefined references to `__ssputws_r' follow collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status The newlib nano is configured with: --disable-newlib-supplied-syscalls --enable-newlib-reent-check-verify --enable-newlib-reent-small --enable-newlib-retargetable-locking --disable-newlib-fvwrite-in-streamio --disable-newlib-fseek-optimization --disable-newlib-wide-orient --enable-newlib-nano-malloc --disable-newlib-unbuf-stream-opt --enable-lite-exit --enable-newlib-global-atexit --enable-newlib-nano-formatted-io --disable-nls Is it expected that the symbol __ssputws_r is referenced but not provided when (I presume this is the reason) --enable-newlib-nano-formatted-io and --disable-newlib-wide-orient is used? Kind regards, Torbjörn