Re: Deprecation/removal of nios2 target support
Dinh Nguyen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.newlib,gmane.comp.gcc.devel,gmane.comp.gnu.binutils,gmane.comp.gdb.patches,gmane.comp.lib.glibc.alpha,gmane.comp.emulators.qemu |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 4/18/24 13:41, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Thu, Apr 18, 2024, at 17:44, Joseph Myers wrote: >> On Wed, 17 Apr 2024, Sandra Loosemore wrote: >> >>> Therefore I'd like to mark Nios II as obsolete in GCC 14 now, and remove >>> support from all toolchain components after the release is made. I'm not sure >>> there is an established process for obsoleting/removing support in other >>> components; besides binutils, GDB, and GLIBC, there's QEMU, newlib/libgloss, >>> and the Linux kernel. But, we need to get the ball rolling somewhere. >> >> CC:ing Arnd Bergmann regarding the obsolescence in the Linux kernel. > > We have not yet marked nios2 as deprecated in the kernel, but that > is mostly because the implementation does not get in the way too > much and Dinh Nguyen is still around as a maintainer and merging > bugfixes. > > Almost all nios2 kernel changes I see in the past decade have been > done blindly without testing on hardware, either for treewide > changes, or by code inspection. The only notable exceptions I could > find are from Andreas Oetken and Bernd Weiberg at Siemens and > from Marek Vasut (all added to Cc in case they have something to add). > > We should probably remove nios2 from the kernel in the near future, > but even if we decide not to, I think deprecating it from gcc is the > right idea: If there are a few remaining users that still plan > to update their kernels, gcc-14 will still be able to build new > kernels for several years. > I'm planning to do this soon. Dinh