Re: [PATCH] Add cast to unsigned char to strverscmp
Christian Franke <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.newlib |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Nov 7 13:58, Joel Sherrill wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 7, 2024 at 1:06 PM <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On 2024-11-07 09:53, Jeremy Bettis wrote: >>>> GCC 14.2 with -Werror=sign-compare fails on this code. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Bettis <[email protected] <mailto: >>> [email protected]>> >>>> --- >>>> newlib/libc/string/strverscmp.c | 2 +- >>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/newlib/libc/string/strverscmp.c >>> b/newlib/libc/string/strverscmp.c >>>> index 55966335f..e86718faa 100644 >>>> --- a/newlib/libc/string/strverscmp.c >>>> +++ b/newlib/libc/string/strverscmp.c >>>> @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ int strverscmp(const char *l0, const char *r0) >>>> else if (c!='0') z=0; >>>> } >>>> >>>> - if (l[dp]<'1' + 9U && r[dp]<'1' + 9U) { > I'm puzzled. This doesn't look like newlib code. Newlib's code looks > like this: > > if (l[dp]-'1'<9U && r[dp]-'1'<9U) { > > See https://sourceware.org/git/?p=newlib-cygwin.git;a=blob;f=newlib/libc/string/strverscmp.c;hb=HEAD#l79 > > Given that l and r are unsigned char anyway, the entire expression > is unsigned, so there shouldn't be a sign-compare error in newlib's > version. > It's actually signed, IIRC due to changing 'unsigned preserving' (K&R C) to 'value preserving' (C89) implicit conversions. "Proof" using C++17 compile time checks: $ cat uchar2int.cc #include <cstddef> #include <type_traits> const unsigned char *l; std::size_t dp; static_assert(std::is_same_v<decltype(l[dp]), const unsigned char &>); static_assert(std::is_same_v<decltype(l[dp]-'1'), int>); static_assert(std::is_same_v<decltype(l[dp]-0x31U), unsigned int>); $ g++ -S -Wall -W uchar2int.cc [no failed assert] -- Regards, Christian