Re: [PATCH] clang compatibility: fpu options
Volodymyr Turanskyy <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.newlib |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <DB4PR08MB8152AD1AD3875155131C364DE0E72@DB4PR08MB8152.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> |
Hi Joel, Let me fix the commit messages. Clang does not have vfpxd - vfpv3xd might be the closest, however we believe that it is not needed for clang at all, so it is skipped. Sincerely, Volodymyr Turanskyy | Principal Software Engineer | CE SW LLVM Team From: Joel Sherrill <[email protected]> Date: Monday, 20 January 2025 at 15:01 To: Volodymyr Turanskyy <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>, nd <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [PATCH] clang compatibility: fpu options Same with missing commit. Does the clang assembler have a directive for vfpxd? If I am reading the patch correctly, it just drops the directive rather than replacing it. --joel On Mon, Jan 20, 2025 at 8:49 AM Volodymyr Turanskyy <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi, Following up on the RFC [1], please find attached a patch that adds a check to avoid extra assembler directives that are not compatible with clang and are not needed by clang. References 1. https://sourceware.org/pipermail/newlib/2025/021452.html Sincerely, Volodymyr Turanskyy | Principal Software Engineer | CE SW LLVM Team