Re: [PATCH 1/1] newlib/libc/include/setjmp.h: Add returns_twice attribute to setjmp()

Brian Inglis <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lib.newlib
Organization Systematic Software
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 2025-10-02 07:57, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> 
> 
> On Wed, Oct 1, 2025 at 4:03 AM Brian Inglis <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
>     On 2025-10-01 01:22, Torbjorn SVENSSON wrote:
>      > On 2025-09-30 16:49, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>      >> The setjmp() function needs this attribute to help GCC avoid false
>      >> positives for the -Wclobbered warning. The -Wclobbered warning is
>      >> part of -Wextra.
>      >> ---
>      >>   newlib/libc/include/setjmp.h | 7 ++++++-
>      >>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>      >>
>      >> diff --git a/newlib/libc/include/setjmp.h b/newlib/libc/include/setjmp.h
>      >> index a2830b275..5c16321a4 100644
>      >> --- a/newlib/libc/include/setjmp.h
>      >> +++ b/newlib/libc/include/setjmp.h
>      >> @@ -17,7 +17,12 @@ void    longjmp (jmp_buf __jmpb, int __retval)
>      >>   #else
>      >>   void    longjmp (jmp_buf __jmpb, int __retval);
>      >>   #endif
>      >> -int    setjmp (jmp_buf __jmpb);
>      >> +
>      >> +#ifdef __GNUC__
>      >> +int    setjmp (jmp_buf __jmpb)
>      >> +            __attribute__ ((returns_twice));;
>      > I suppose you only want a single semi-colon here.
>      >> +#else
>      > I think you should also drop the empty "#else" block.
>      >> +#endif
>      >>   _END_STD_C
> 
>     Shouldn't the conditional be around the attribute only?
> 
> 
> That's not the way setjmp() was. It has this (tabs lost with copy and paste):
> 
> #ifdef __GNUC__
> void longjmp (jmp_buf __jmpb, int __retval)
> __attribute__ ((__noreturn__));
> #else
> void longjmp (jmp_buf __jmpb, int __retval);
> #endif
> 
> I just copied the style of what was there.
> 
> 
>     -int    setjmp (jmp_buf __jmpb);
>     +int    setjmp (jmp_buf __jmpb)
>     +#ifdef __GNUC__
>     +               __attribute__ ((returns_twice))
>     +#endif
>     +               ;
> 
> 
> Do you want longjmp() changed to match this also?

Your choice - it's just a matter of style: Cygwin tweaks do this a lot, leaving 
as much of the existing code alone as possible, avoiding duplication and having 
to check for changes in two lines if something changes, especially if derived 
from an upstream original.

-- 
Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis              Calgary, Alberta, Canada

La perfection est atteinte                   Perfection is achieved
non pas lorsqu'il n'y a plus rien à ajouter  not when there is no more to add
mais lorsqu'il n'y a plus rien à retrancher  but when there is no more to cut
                                 -- Antoine de Saint-Exupéry
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.