Re: riscv: configure.ac bug fix for misaligned access when __riscv_misaligned_slow

Gedare Bloom <[email protected]> Mon, 11 May 2026 10:33:56 -0600
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lib.newlib
Message-ID <CAC82fA1D61f014BJOCb59u-6V=MhRNQbXsbMdRPAyzwDV5D_Ug@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, May 7, 2026 at 6:06 AM Pincheng Wang
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Gedare,
>
> I have a question regarding this inconsistency between the
> compiler-defined macro and actual hardware behavior. Please do not take
> this message as a review comment.
>
> On 2026/5/1 13:28, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> > memcmp is generating data alignment errors on risc-v targets where the
> > hw does not allow unaligned access. This behavior was observed on
> > microchip polarfire with rtems. Here is the code generated:
> >
> > 000000008000bb34 <memcmp>:
> >      8000bb34:   469d                    li      a3,7
> >      8000bb36:   00c6fb63                bgeu    a3,a2,8000bb4c <memcmp+0x18>
> >      8000bb3a:   6118                    ld      a4,0(a0)
> >      8000bb3c:   619c                    ld      a5,0(a1)
> >
> > You can see that 8000bb3a will cause a fault if a0 is not aligned and
> > hw does not support it.
> >
> > riscv-rtems7-gcc -dM -E - < /dev/null | grep aligned
> > #define __riscv_misaligned_slow 1
> >
>
> According to the riscv-c-api-doc[1], "__riscv_misaligned_slow" macro
> shuold be defined when scalar misaligned *are supported* but slower than
> aligned accesses. For hardwares that not allow unaligned access at all,
> "__riscv_misaligned_avoid" seems to be the more appropriate macro.
>
> So, I am wondering whether this is actually a compiler issue rather than
> a C library issue?
>

This is a good point. I was taking my inspiration from the
implementations of memcpy and memmove, which only check for
__riscv_misaligned_fast.
I'm not sure what the right answer is for the optimization.

Regarding my problem with alignment error, you are correct that this
is probably better fixed by using a multilib with mstrict-align
defined so that I get the _avoid variant.

> > Attached fix corrects this. Generated code is now:
> > 00000008000baf6 <memcmp>:
> >      8000baf6:   469d                    li      a3,7
> >      8000baf8:   04c6f063                bgeu    a3,a2,8000bb38 <memcmp+0x42>
> >      8000bafc:   00a5e7b3                or      a5,a1,a0
> >      8000bb00:   8b9d                    andi    a5,a5,7
> >      8000bb02:   c395                    beqz    a5,8000bb26 <memcmp+0x30>
> >      8000bb04:   167d                    addi    a2,a2,-1
> >      8000bb06:   0605                    addi    a2,a2,1
> >      8000bb08:   962a                    add     a2,a2,a0
> >      8000bb0a:   a019                    j       8000bb10 <memcmp+0x1a>
> >
> > Now we have the check at 8000bb02 that will handle alignment and
> > falls-thru to byte-by-byte copy, or jumps to aligned long copies.
> >
> > Gedare
>
> Best regards,
> Pincheng Wang
>
> [1]
> https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-c-api-doc/blob/main/src/c-api.adoc
>