[PATCH 2/3] libc: Remove support for pre-C99 C standards
Sebastian Huber <[email protected]> Sat, 20 Jun 2026 07:39:45 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.newlib |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
From: Minsoo Choo <[email protected]> Reviewed by: jhb Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D43254 --- newlib/libc/stdlib/div.c | 35 +---------------------------------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 34 deletions(-) diff --git a/newlib/libc/stdlib/div.c b/newlib/libc/stdlib/div.c index 4296f1e80..467f25aa3 100644 --- a/newlib/libc/stdlib/div.c +++ b/newlib/libc/stdlib/div.c @@ -86,39 +86,6 @@ div (int num, =20 r.quot =3D num / denom; r.rem =3D num % denom; - /* - * The ANSI standard says that |r.quot| <=3D |n/d|, where - * n/d is to be computed in infinite precision. In other - * words, we should always truncate the quotient towards - * 0, never -infinity or +infinity. - * - * Machine division and remainer may work either way when - * one or both of n or d is negative. If only one is - * negative and r.quot has been truncated towards -inf, - * r.rem will have the same sign as denom and the opposite - * sign of num; if both are negative and r.quot has been - * truncated towards -inf, r.rem will be positive (will - * have the opposite sign of num). These are considered - * `wrong'. - * - * If both are num and denom are positive, r will always - * be positive. - * - * This all boils down to: - * if num >=3D 0, but r.rem < 0, we got the wrong answer. - * In that case, to get the right answer, add 1 to r.quot and - * subtract denom from r.rem. - * if num < 0, but r.rem > 0, we also have the wrong answer. - * In this case, to get the right answer, subtract 1 from r.quot and - * add denom to r.rem. - */ - if (num >=3D 0 && r.rem < 0) { - ++r.quot; - r.rem -=3D denom; - } - else if (num < 0 && r.rem > 0) { - --r.quot; - r.rem +=3D denom; - } + return (r); } --=20 2.51.0