Re: dCollideConvexBox and dCollideConvexCapsule not implemented
"Oleh Derevenko" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.ode |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Also, I would like to ask what is preferred line separator to be used for patches? LF or CRLF? Oleh Derevenko -- ICQ: 36361783 ----- Original Message ----- From: Bram Stolk To: Oleh Derevenko Cc: [email protected] Sent: 18 вересня 2007 р. 18:23 Subject: Re: [ODE] dCollideConvexBox and dCollideConvexCapsule not implemented There should be no asserts for those. The desired behaviour is to have the objects just pass through each other if the collide combo is not supported. On 9/18/07, Oleh Derevenko <[email protected]> wrote: Hi I've found that dCollideConvexBox and dCollideConvexCapsule are not implemented (empty fnctions). Would it be better if I put dIASSERT(false) into them or I should rather avoid doing that to not cause more problems for somebody? As to my opinion, it is necessary to add asserts there to prevent using that code in production. If somebody would be developing that code and would need testing convex with some kinds of shapes while ignoring all the rest kinds he/she can comment those assertions in the local copy. Oleh Derevenko -- ICQ: 36361783 _______________________________________________ ODE mailing list [email protected] http://ode.org/mailman/listinfo/ode -- Zapp: Captain's log, stardate...er.. Kif: Ohhh. April 13th. Zapp: April 13th. Point 2. _______________________________________________ ODE mailing list [email protected] http://ode.org/mailman/listinfo/ode