Re: 0.8.2 candidate

On 9/27/07, Bram Stolk <[email protected]> wrote:
> We need to release a candidate for 0.8.2

I will get to it ASAP, and I will label it 0.8.2...but I'm going to
let you handle all of the inevitable "where's 0.8.1?" questions.   :)

I realize version numbers are more or less arbitrary, but is there
some rationale behind adding another digit instead of going to 0.9?
(0.5 -> 0.6 -> 0.7 -> 0.8 -> 0.8.2 ??)

Jason