Re: 0.8.2 candidate

Hello!

I'm a newbie here. Is manual on website updated when new features/options are added? Should I create tracker item for describing my new flag to dCollide() in documentation?

Oleh Derevenko
-- ICQ: 36361783

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Bram Stolk 
  To: Jason Perkins 
  Cc: ode-list 
  Sent: 27 вересня 2007 р. 20:13
  Subject: Re: [ODE] 0.8.2 candidate





  On 9/27/07, Jason Perkins <[email protected]> wrote:
    On 9/27/07, Bram Stolk <[email protected]> wrote:
    > We need to release a candidate for 0.8.2

    I will get to it ASAP, and I will label it 0.8.2...but I'm going to 

  Thanks mate. 



    let you handle all of the inevitable "where's 0.8.1?" questions.   :)


  Sure thing.
  After I have answered it 3 times in this list, I will make it a faq.
  Let's see if it gets to be a faq  entry :-) 





    I realize version numbers are more or less arbitrary, but is there
    some rationale behind adding another digit instead of going to 0.9?
    (0.5 -> 0.6 -> 0.7 -> 0.8 -> 0.8.2 ??)

  Well, the rationale is that it leaves us some space to 1.0 ?
  We can go to 0.9 if you prefer that.
  The long list of changes may warrant a higher bump in version?

  1.0 sounds like a good version nr for a really stable, proven and established release.

  2.0 would be the thing to use once we break API compatibility. 
  Did ODE ever break API compatibility before? If we do, we get to clean up this ugly convention of adding a '2' to several functions if they behave slightly different. Yuck!

    bram



    Jason




  -- 
  Zapp: Captain's log, stardate...er..
  Kif: Ohhh. April 13th.
  Zapp: April 13th. Point 2. 


------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  ODE mailing list
  [email protected]
  http://ode.org/mailman/listinfo/ode

_______________________________________________
ODE mailing list
[email protected]
http://ode.org/mailman/listinfo/ode