Re: Optimal buffersize and GUI
Jimmy Gervais <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.openal |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Nevermind, it works under 8192. It was my mistake. 2010/6/1 Jason Daly <[email protected]> > Fruskus wrote: > > So, there is no "optimal buffer size". There is not justification for using > one value or another, it just has to be a multiple of the block size, and > big enough for avoiding underruns. It's that right? > > > > Right. > > Primarily, it's going to be a trade-off between latency (larger buffers > take more time to queue up and play) and performance/stability (shorter > buffers need to be checked and refilled more often to avoid gaps). > > --"J" > > _______________________________________________ > Openal mailing list > [email protected] > http://opensource.creative.com/mailman/listinfo/openal > > _______________________________________________ Openal mailing list [email protected] http://opensource.creative.com/mailman/listinfo/openal