Re: NPTL v userland v LT (RH9+custom kernel problem)
Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.phil,gmane.linux.kernel |
|---|---|
| Organization | Red Hat, Inc. |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> So, finally getting to my question, should I even *expect* a non-NPTL > kernel to work with the RH9 userland? Yes, absolutely. It's a design goal of RHL to work with unpatched kernel.org kernels. > > If not, is there a simple fix > without going to NPTL, say just rebuilding glibc? hmm... now that I > ask it I feel dumb, I do think I would need to rebuild glibc so it > knows the kernel has LinuxThreads, not NPTL. no need. RHL9 ships with BOTH LinuxThreads and NPTL and will switch dynamically at runtime depending on your kernel capabilities.
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA/MhKhxULwo51rQBIRAgjPAJwPmxbb6VAkrlmv+fsqCwODu1N7lwCeL822 laIt31On2BtumZnKCSMWBv4= =wkMv -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----