RE: Anyone interested in having additional debugging support in NPTL via a tracing facility?
"Harrow, Jerry" <[email protected]> Mon, 2 Feb 2004 09:28:14 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.phil |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <280273517079B94E9CE26B95D2856A26046AE3B8@tayexc13.americas.cpqcorp.net> |
>>Does this duplicate any functionality in oprofile? Nope, this is totally different. It is primarily useful for debugging. -Jer >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Dan Kegel [mailto:[email protected]] >>Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2004 2:06 AM >>To: Harrow, Jerry >>Cc: [email protected] >>Subject: Re: Anyone interested in having additional debugging support in >>NPTL via a tracing facility? >> >>Harrow, Jerry wrote: >>> I've had some on & off discussions with Ulrich about adding detailed >>> event tracing support to NPTL for quite a while. While favoring the >>> idea in general, Ulrich isn't convinced that people (i.e. you all) have >>> much of a desire for it. When I last posted a proposal in this regard >>> (https://listman.redhat.com/archives/phil-list/2002-December/msg00043.ht >>> ml) there was only one reply -- obviously not an overwhelming >>> endorsement. I've done some updates on the original proposal and >>> published it to >>> ftp://ftp.compaq.com/pub/products/visualthreads/Linux/NPTLTracingV2.html >> >>Does this duplicate any functionality in oprofile? >>- Dan