Re: [PATCH] tst-cond16 fix - NPTL part
Jakub Jelinek <[email protected]> Fri, 21 May 2004 03:55:48 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.phil |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 08:41:39AM +0200, Thorsten Kukuk wrote: > On Thu, May 20, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > This is the NPTL part of the tst-cond16 fix. > > For PPC (and some other architectures) I need the attached patch > for compiling. But while on ix86 the patch alone (without fixed > kernel) solves the problem, it does not do so on PPC. Ok, I admit I have only tested this on i386 (4xHT) and x86_64 (UP only) so far. On PPC, is tst-cond16 the only test that fails with this patch? Are you using a kernel without FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE there as well? Can you see with say strace if FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE returns an error in all cases that it is run and that it does the FUTEX_WAKE call afterwards? I'll test this later today on PPC (without FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE in the kernel). Jakub