Re: [PATCH 2.5.64] Real-time futexes (priority inheritance/protection/robust support) take 4

"Alexander Terekhov" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lib.phil
Organization http://freemail.web.de/
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Inaky Perez-Gonzalez <[email protected]> schrieb am 22.03.03 06:50:06:
[...]
> Patch at: http://sost.net/pub/linux/rtfutex-4.patch

+  + POSIX contradictions 
[...]
+  This is kind of a divagation, it does not make too much sense for me
+  and I don't see it clear (POSIX wise) ... do they refer to the
+  thread priority or the effective priority after applying futex
+  adjustements? 

They refer to the "effective priority", I think. Probably, the reason 
is that if you nest PI and PP locks then you may end up having the 
Unbounded Priority Inversion (TM) problem if the locker's "effective 
priority" (inherited one) is higher than the ceiling. I may be missing 
and/or misunderstanding something, of course.

regards,
alexander.

______________________________________________________________________________
Werden Sie kreativ! Jetzt HTML-Mails nicht nur schreiben - nein -
GESTALTEN, bei WEB.DE FreeMail! http://freemail.web.de/features/?mc=021141
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.