Re: Elements for inactive additional selections
Neil Hodgson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.scintilla.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
rol...@logikalsolutions: I suspected there was no "just turn it off" switch because I didn't see any mention of it in the documentation Something else to look at is SCI_SETFOCUS which allows unfocussed Scintilla instances to appear to have focus. Without a way to physically turn off inactive selection highlighting there is no way to fix this from within Scintilla. I have to roll back CopperSpice to a version without the bug. Until their QTextEdit module actually implements the same feature the team behind CopperSpice aren't going to fix this. If I have to fix it, I will be creating an official fork of CopperSpice because they are unresponsive to the users. I'm having trouble working out what bug could possibly cause these symptoms on some systems. It's the same code drawing the active and inactive states and it should only differ in colours and translucency. Perhaps the drawing surfaces are different configurations on different machines (high-colour versus shallow-colour, for example) and the platform drawing code didn't implement some drawing operations on particular configurations or implemented them poorly. Neil -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "scintilla-interest" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/scintilla-interest/4893e227-5036-42c4-bad8-53e9a1dac09fn%40googlegroups.com.