Re: Inconsistent documentation for margin masks

Hi Neil,

> On Apr 16, 2025, at 9:54 PM, Neil Hodgson <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Looking through history, it appears that the documentation describes aspects of the implementation that were true at different points. Then the margin was hidden by default and its mask set to 0 instead of all the fold symbols.
> 
> It would likely be better behaviour for new projects to restore the fold symbol mask for margin 2 but that may cause unwanted change to existing applications. Probably best to err on the side of caution by continuing the current behaviour and changing the documentation to omit 'folding symbols'. so:
> 
> "Margin 2 is a symbol margin that is given a width of 0, so it is hidden."

That’s fine. My application will continue to define a fold symbol mask for margin 2 then.

Cheers,
Mitchell

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "scintilla-interest" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/scintilla-interest/4EC1F9CD-E0D8-4251-9745-BF8A5EF38AF5%40foicica.com.