Re: Minimum GCC version
"'Robin Haberkorn' via scintilla-interest" <[email protected]> Sat, 27 Sep 2025 11:01:29 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.scintilla.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sat Sep 27, 2025 at 04:07:12 GMT +03, Neil Hodgson wrote: > Supporting older compiler versions adds extra work to new features and > maintenance so it's unlikely I'll accept work-arounds. Indeed, it may > be time to consider incrementing the language baseline to C++20, a > standard from 5 years ago. I would argue against it. 5 years ago the standard was released, but when did all the major compilers fully support it? How long did it take to become available in all relevant operating systems and Linux distributions? Also, compatibility with slightly outdated systems is nice to have. But that's my philosophy personally. I bump versions only if I have a very good reason. Best regards, Robin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "scintilla-interest" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/scintilla-interest/DD3J53B5JBO4.228LFIPMWWWLZ%40googlemail.com.
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 488 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCAAdFiEEB/6AD3js1eGB4raKarMDYY4q6voFAmjXxAsACgkQarMDYY4q 6vp/Zwf/ZdNpZbRNlSOp74M1BTv4ieDdbeldTCCIFD3IOgkCBB7A5chq1q7StyUu V+2TlxUOu9lVkrrNYiNzzy7nvsMoZXjdFUF2/jS9mGWtPLDn2+b/VOQ5hcrW1quF /ged75SnG5O2znqyGphgxaBtG72/Ybtm98xWWHhkJKf4gHFl4qrcfS+KH0l858rb 52VaXuGzsa2sOcgp7zI6Z+MpY0JCf6ZspUWgcfKE80S1DRUg86NkQ5ccNLY7jrUB 1IT0K7za+ddXifl6szgLVTwbPy4dOJKzzy9E6RCzvb8/b75DxERlFZ1GjgKOGQUT e39YnJMmt7ymahofQvkLa+lz44S50g== =4c+E -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----