Re: Windows XP support
"Dominus" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.sdl |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
rtrussell wrote: > > Dominus wrote: > > Messing up the release is not the same as not supporting something anymore... > > SDL 2.0.4, SDL_ttf 2.0.13 and SDL_ttf 2.0.14 binaries are all 64-bit only for Mac (I don't know about the latest releases of SDL_image and SDL_mixer because I haven't checked). For multiple releases to be affected like this makes me worry that it was deliberate. And if it was simply a "messed up release" wouldn't you think somebody would have responded to my bug reports confirming that? > I really don't think that non-response is an indicator for either. Since all of those depend on the SDL 2.0.4 release, it makes sense for them to be all 64bit. They *couldn't* be universal if SDL 2.0.4 is 64bit only. Since it is likely the same person made all of those releases, if he messed up it makes sense for everything to be messed up. Why there is no response, who knows. SDL is seriously not packed with active developers and a lot of things are left unanswered, so I don't think it is any indication whatsoever. You can quickly build those frameworks yourself, btw... _______________________________________________ SDL mailing list [email protected] http://lists.libsdl.org/listinfo.cgi/sdl-libsdl.org