Re: Windows XP support

and proud :-)



> On 15 Aug 2016, at 11:08, Marvin Marvin <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> nerds
> 
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 8:54 AM, jeroen clarysse <[email protected]> wrote:
> I would like to add that performance-wise, SDL1.2 has serious issues from Vista upwards hen combining GDI with SDL.
> 
> 
> > On 15 Aug 2016, at 08:05, Bandock <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > BenoitRen wrote:
> > The great thing about SDL 1.2 is that it runs on Windows 95 all the way to Windows 8. I don't know if it runs on Windows 10, but it wouldn't surprise me. The graphics capabilities were limited, however, which is why SDL2 is a big deal. But if platform support is going to be limited to the latest versions of popular OSs, its usefulness is severely reduced.
> >
> >
> > It definitely runs on Windows 10 since DOSBox currently uses a version of SDL from the 1.x branch (though some have been working on builds that use the 2.x branch).
> > _______________________________________________
> > SDL mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.libsdl.org/listinfo.cgi/sdl-libsdl.org
> 
> _______________________________________________
> SDL mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.libsdl.org/listinfo.cgi/sdl-libsdl.org
> 
> _______________________________________________
> SDL mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.libsdl.org/listinfo.cgi/sdl-libsdl.org