Re: strange situation installing SDL
Jonathan Dearborn <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.sdl |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CA+DSiHa-g0GWyjrWNMa6u08zomLaniRoc3u55UqWvJad+thXFA@mail.gmail.com> |
SDL also helps you along by setting up the sdl2-config utility. Use sdl2-config to tell your compiler where to find the headers and your linker where to find the libraries. https://wiki.libsdl.org/FAQLinux Jonny D On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 9:48 AM, Jacek Migacz <[email protected]> wrote: > ANSWER: SDL does not install to a directory that is not searched. You do. > Try to reconfigure it with standard prefix; "--configure --prefix=/usr". > > On Debian-like distro, you should probably use "apt-get source" instead of > pulling an upstream tarball. > > Also moving .so files manually can potentially cause even more issues. > > Finally, you can verify dynamic linker cache by "ldconfig -p | grep SDL". > > -- > Jacek Migacz > > 2016-09-28 14:54 GMT+02:00 bilsch01 <[email protected]>: > >> Using 32-bit Ubuntu 14.04 and installing SDL2-2.0.4 from source. The SDL >> libraries were installed in /usr/local/lib but at runtime my SDL program >> cant find the shared library libSDL2-2.0.so.0. I ran STRACE and found that >> the program searches in several directories for the shared library but >> doesn't find it anywhere. One of the paths searched is /usr/lib, so I >> copied the library there and the program runs fine. QUESTION: why does SDL >> install to a directory that is not searched? >> >> TIA. Bill S. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SDL mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.libsdl.org/listinfo.cgi/sdl-libsdl.org >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > SDL mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.libsdl.org/listinfo.cgi/sdl-libsdl.org > > _______________________________________________ SDL mailing list [email protected] http://lists.libsdl.org/listinfo.cgi/sdl-libsdl.org