Re: Out of scope? socket wrappers
Mike Abbott <[email protected]> Sun, 27 Oct 2002 19:21:11 -0800 (PST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.state-threads.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> res.c gets pulled into libst > a 'st_new_socket()' function added > a 'st_bind_tcp_port(fd, port)' function added > a 'st_bind_udp_port(fd, port)' function added > With those four functions added, a client of the libst library could > theorectically make use of ONLY libst calls with regards to networking. I see beauty in unity too, but st was never meant to be a replacement for regular socket calls. Also, from the FAQ: Perfection is achieved not when there is nothing more to add, but rather when there is nothing more to take away. -- Antoine de Saint-Exupery -- Mike Abbott [email protected] State Threads Project co-administrator ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ApacheCon, November 18-21 in Las Vegas (supported by COMDEX), the only Apache event to be fully supported by the ASF. http://www.apachecon.com