Re: Out of scope? socket wrappers

Mike Abbott <[email protected]> Sun, 27 Oct 2002 19:21:11 -0800 (PST)
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lib.state-threads.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
> 	res.c gets pulled into libst
> 	a 'st_new_socket()' function added
> 	a 'st_bind_tcp_port(fd, port)' function added
> 	a 'st_bind_udp_port(fd, port)' function added
> With those four functions added, a client of the libst library could
> theorectically make use of ONLY libst calls with regards to networking.

I see beauty in unity too, but st was never meant to be a replacement
for regular socket calls.  Also, from the FAQ:

	Perfection is achieved not when there is nothing more to add,
	but rather when there is nothing more to take away.
	-- Antoine de Saint-Exupery
-- 
Mike Abbott    [email protected]
State Threads Project co-administrator


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ApacheCon, November 18-21 in
Las Vegas (supported by COMDEX), the only Apache event to be
fully supported by the ASF. http://www.apachecon.com