Re: naming conventions

Robert Roebling wrote:
> Well, if you use
> using wx;

That's true. My preference -- probably shared by no one else -- is to 
leave the 'wx.' on the front of everything, which makes it look like all 
of the old C++ code that I am porting.


> then the wx suffix is no longer needed and if you use
> the constant in (the constructor of) a window class
> then the Window won't be needed. 

That's right.

Jason
379




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open! 
Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and 
the chance of winning an Apple iPod:
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en