Re: I've got a rather simple question
Bryan Bulten <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.wxwindows.wxnet |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20040308170717.02fe4ded@goliath> |
Sorry for the late reply... changed addresses, and forgot to change it for this list :-) > First someone should change all wxWindows to wxWidgets > [more: http://www.wxwindows.org/name.htm]. and just pote a note, that > wxWindows is now wxWidgets. also the license would be renamed to > wxWindows license, and now is a good time for wxnet to go LGPL. :P > [who am I to say such things..] :D Names have been changed for the release. The wxWindows license is a variant of the LGPL. > why wxnet or fooGUIlib doesn't have the exact name that Windows.Forms > have? Because wx.NET is not a Windows.Forms replacement/clone. It uses the wxWidgets API, so calling it Windows.Forms would be rather confusing. > is there a copyright problem? and if there is one. I don't get it. how > is it possible to copyright the word 'Dialog'? > and force<?> wx use wxDialog. ms shouldn't then use msDialog. No, I don't think there's anything like that. Mono has a Windows.Forms implementation that uses WINE, and Portable.NET is building one using of X. Cheers. -- Bryan Bulten http://www.bulten.ca/ http://wxnet.sourceforge.net/
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFATO6c32WFWIzmzHgRAj7IAJwJT010jxSW2OUYPSSYrNapey2tPACffTdF IwoOoNMfQgt4GWW3zEiB1hk= =cBro -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----