Re: Evaluating the Enforceability of a License Should Not be a Criteria for OSI License Review

Bastien <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.licenses.open-source.general
Organization GNU
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Patrick Schleizer via License-discuss
<[email protected]> writes:

> Concerns regarding the enforceability of a license, especially across
> different jurisdictions, should not be a determinant in the approval
> or rejection of a license. 

+1 but with this caveat: we should distinguish between formal (or
legal) enforceability vs. practical enforceability.

Practical enforceability should not be a criteria for OSI License
Review.

Format enforceability should.  E.g. a license that would say "This
Work is considered public domain after X years" would not be legally
enforceable in France, where copyright holders cannot decide to put
something in the public domain.

But yes, if the spirit of the argument is to prevent _practical_
consideration to mix with fundamental principles, I fully agree.

-- 
 Bastien

_______________________________________________
The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Official statements by the Open Source Initiative will be sent from an opensource.org email address.

License-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.