Re: Query on "delayed open source" licensing
Josh Berkus <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.licenses.open-source.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 10/27/23 11:06, Bradley M. Kuhn wrote: > I'm sad (but also sadly not surprised) to see that OSI is not willing to > outright criticize this model, since it is primarily a proprietary > software model. If researchers start out with a predefined conclusion, you get shoddy research. A research project is seperate from any editorials that OSI might publish, and should be. -- Josh Berkus _______________________________________________ The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Official statements by the Open Source Initiative will be sent from an opensource.org email address. License-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org