Re: Question: is the following paragraph in violation of OSD6
Lucy Brown via License-discuss <[email protected]> Fri, 4 Oct 2024 10:22:58 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.licenses.open-source.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
"Standard Version" as used in the license means "Unmodified source code", this license also has the other version you mentioned, as well, it’s the following paragraph: “Neither the name of the project nor the name, username, handle, etc, of the project developer may be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software without specific prior written permission.” You can read the full license at the link below. https://raw.githubusercontent.com/anoraktrend/Berkeley-Artistic/refs/heads/main/license On Fri, Oct 4, 2024 at 10:10 Josh Berkus <[email protected]> wrote: On 10/3/24 13:12, Lucy Brown via License-discuss wrote: > You may distribute this Software, with or without fee, provided that you > do not advertise the Standard Version of this Software as a product of > your own. We'd need to hash that out. It certainly feels hinky, but I'm not sure whether it would be an OSD violation or not. Generally, *requirements* to advertise anything aside from the licensing terms are violations of OSD 8 and 10. Requirements to not advertise something? Not sure. That assumes that by "Standard Version" the license means "Unmodified source code"; if it means something else, it would depend on what. Regardless, it's not possible to make any real judgement without seeing the whole license. The more common thing in licenses is a requirement to NOT include the source organization's name on modified versions. -- Josh Berkus _______________________________________________ The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Official statements by the Open Source Initiative will be sent from an opensource.org email address. License-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org _______________________________________________ The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Official statements by the Open Source Initiative will be sent from an opensource.org email address. License-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org