Re: Pre-Advice for ModelGo Licenses Review

On 11/02/2025 00:27, "D 莫名 (dewitt)" wrote:
> The MG-*-OS License requires providing a copy of the code but does not enforce a specific license for it. My lawyer opposed adding such enforcement due to potential incompatibility between the code license and our MG license.

Responsible open source users generally will not touch code that doesn't 
have an explicit licence.  For one thing, the assumption is that the 
supplier will be assumed not to understand copyright, and therefore the 
code may be in breach, itself.

Also, my understanding is that, at least in the UK, an explicit licence 
is needed even before machine code can be copied into working memory, 
and certainly for machine code being generated from source code.
_______________________________________________
The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Official statements by the Open Source Initiative will be sent from an opensource.org email address.

License-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org