Re: [DISCUSS] PUWL v1.0 – P-EADCA Universal Waiver License
McCoy Smith <[email protected]> Thu, 2 Oct 2025 08:01:05 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.licenses.open-source.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 10/2/2025 12:42 AM, Balázs Hámorszky wrote: > The idea behind PUWL is to provide the broadest possible "Universal Waiver" > in every jurisdiction. That’s why I combined several existing permissive/waiver > licenses. A clarification that they apply in order rather than simultaneously > might help, but I’m also considering whether writing a new, cleaner text > would be the better path. > > I've always thought there was room for a CC-0 less the disclaimer of patent rights. I wouldn't counsel you try to do this yourself. It's something I think that CC should do (CC0-2.0?) _______________________________________________ The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Official statements by the Open Source Initiative will be sent from an opensource.org email address. License-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org