Re: [DISCUSS] PUWL v1.0 – P-EADCA Universal Waiver License

Balázs Hámorszky <[email protected]> Thu, 9 Oct 2025 02:53:08 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.comp.licenses.open-source.general
Message-ID <CAFna2KHeEYr2ib5BpqkH37U6TLjJrrHMaSbxugdhAHi0m6Lf7Q@mail.gmail.com>
I've done some updates and added a patent part.

https://github.com/balihb/PUWL/blob/main/LICENSE.v2draft02

On Tue, Oct 7, 2025 at 4:06 PM David Woolley <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 06/10/2025 19:45, Pamela Chestek wrote:
> > Are there jurisdictions that do not allow you to waive attribution?
> >
> > I would also like to see an explanation of how all the other licenses
> > that attempt to achieve this fail, and how this license has remedied
> > their flaws.
>
> As I understand it, what the moral rights rule does is to make any
> contract not to assert moral rights void, in that respect.  You can
> still choose to not assert them at a particular time,  but the recipient
> has no come back, if you subsequently do assert them.
>
> Regarding another comment, I would say that would mean a promise not to
> assert them is not enforceable.
>
> IANAL.
>
> _______________________________________________
> The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Official statements by the Open Source Initiative will be sent from an opensource.org email address.
>
> License-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org

_______________________________________________
The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Official statements by the Open Source Initiative will be sent from an opensource.org email address.

License-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org