Re: Proposal of new new open-source license for graphics (TERO-GL-1.0)

Morten,

> I am representing Teradyne Robotics A/S, a division of Teradyne inc. 
> (https://www.teradyne.com/ <https://www.teradyne.com/>), that provides 
> robot arms (https://www.universal-robots.com/ <https://www.universal- 
> robots.com/>) and autonomous mobile robots (https://mobile-industrial- 
> robots.com/ <https://mobile-industrial-robots.com/>).

While I haven't reviewed the text of the license, there seems to be a 
core purpose of the license that's at odds with open source requirements:

 > The main goal was to find a license that would allow third parties to 
use these models in simulation environments while not allowing them to 
manufacture physical products based on them.

That's a clear violation of OSD6 ("no discrimination against fields of 
endeavor"), as far as I can tell, and explains why you couldn't find an 
existing open source license that suited your purpose.  This is very 
similar to "no commercial use" licenses that are popular with a variety 
of entities; those can be open-ish, but they are not open source.

It sounds like what you want is more of a "shared source" license, or 
even an agreement, for your association.

-- 
Josh Berkus

_______________________________________________
The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Official statements by the Open Source Initiative will be sent from an opensource.org email address.

License-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org