Contributor Clauses in Licenses

All:

We've seen a recent trend in new licenses to include a clause governing 
contributions to the project (there may be some in older licenses too, I 
haven't done a review).  This seems both weird and ineffective to me, 
because:

1. Unless enforced by some other mechanism (CLA, repository TOS, etc.), 
it is not automatically true that contributions are under the license in 
the first place;

2. A license cannot reasonably contain the full multiple-page-long set 
of the various things that a contributor should comply with, leaving us 
with a very arbitrary selection.

Given the above, I feel like any terms applying to contributors should 
be in individual projects' contributor documentation and governance, and 
have no place in an OSS license.

Discuss?

-- 
Josh Berkus


_______________________________________________
The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Official statements by the Open Source Initiative will be sent from an opensource.org email address.

License-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org