Re: Licensing audit of SWORD for Fedora - sharing results with upstream
Fr Cyrille <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.literature.sword.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
For Ubuntu, there's already a ppa for Crosswire. It would be coherent for us to put everything together on this ppa: https://launchpad.net/~pkgcrosswire/+archive/ubuntu/ppa. You'd need to have full access rights, which I do, but I can't do it for you - you'd have to ask DImitri: https://launchpad.net/~xnox Le 06/10/2023 à 10:12, Jaak Ristioja a écrit : > Please understand, that we might nevertheless decide to host our own > Fedora repository for BibleTime as well. > > BibleTime developers are not responsible for packages we did not > create ourselves, but when issues with these packages arise many users > still complain directly to us. Oftentimes they just ask for some newer > version of BibleTime to be packaged for their platform. Many > distributions also have restrictive packaging policies which prevent > introducing new (major) versions of packages to stable distribution > versions. Hosting our own repositories might help in that regard and > we would also not be tied to having to support older versions of > BibleTime we no longer can or wish to support. We have very limited > resources and can't afford to manage BibleTime within distribution > repositories. > > On 06.10.23 09:58, Aaron Rainbolt wrote: >> No worries there, I would be doing all the work of managing BibleTime >> within the Fedora repositories, the devs wouldn't have to do extra >> work for that to happen. >> >> If the BibleTime developers are interested in hosting their own repos >> for other distros, that's certainly their option (and a good idea in >> my opinion), however having BibleTime directly in distribution repos >> will obviously make it easier for end-users to install and use it, so >> I'd like to make that happen by maintaining the package in Fedora. (I >> also have experience with Debian packaging so if the current Debian >> maintainer gives up on it, I might be able to help there too.) >> >> On Fri, Oct 6, 2023 at 1:42 AM Jaak Ristioja <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> On 05.10.23 20:59, Aaron Rainbolt wrote: >>>> Thanks! If all of the comaintainers for Xiphos and BibleTime are >>>> also no >>>> longer available or interested, I think it would be helpful if you >>>> could >>>> go into https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/xiphos and >>>> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/bibletime and click the "Orphan" >>>> button on those. I'll take them once that's done and should be able to >>>> help keep them maintained. >>> >>> BibleTime would be interested in hosting their own package repositories >>> for different distributions and their versions, which would be updated >>> by the CI (see [1]) and perhaps be of low maintenance burden. We don't >>> have the resources to commit to managing BibleTime packages under the >>> umbrella of different distros. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> J >>> >>> >>> [1]: https://github.com/bibletime/bibletime/issues/258 >>> _______________________________________________ >>> sword-devel mailing list: [email protected] >>> http://crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel >>> Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page >> _______________________________________________ >> sword-devel mailing list: [email protected] >> http://crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel >> Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page > > _______________________________________________ > sword-devel mailing list: [email protected] > http://crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel > Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page _______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: [email protected] http://crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page