Re: OSHB module

https://crosswire.org/svn/sword/trunk/src/modules/lexdict/swld.cpp

Have a look at SWLD::strongsPad

This method is supposed to be called everywhere Strongs numbers are dealt with. It is supposed to ease the pain of dealing with the various ways Strongs numbers are encoded.

If you find a use case which isn't working, let me know and we'll try to fix it.

As far as standardizing on the way these are encoded in modules, I am in favor of encoding all new modules, going forward, with the way Paratext requires them.

Troy

On April 15, 2024 15:52:36 GMT-03:00, "David "Judah's Shadow" Blue" <[email protected]> wrote:
>On Monday, April 15, 2024 12:28:50 PM EDT Fr Cyrille wrote:
>> I don't know what to do to get an answer from those who can tell us
>> which way to go...
>> It's true that on git we could work much more easily by pull request,
>> which may or may not be accepted.
>
>To backtrack for a moment, to make sure I understand the issue, there is a 
>discrepancy with strong numbers between modules with the number of leading 0s 
>after the G/H Greek/Hebrew indicator yes? So some modules would have G000001 
>and some G00001 or something to that effect?
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>sword-devel mailing list: [email protected]
>http://crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
>Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

_______________________________________________
sword-devel mailing list: [email protected]
http://crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page