Re: OSHB module
Karl Kleinpaste <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.literature.sword.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 4/23/24 10:47, Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
> It is dependent on whether or not a module has the StrongsPadding=true
> in its .conf file. All Strongs-keyed dictionaries should have this
> entry.
Well, now, that's an educational moment. Never heard of StrongsPadding
before. Apparently neither has much of anyone else.
$ pwd
/home/karl/.sword/mods.d
$ ls | wc -l
890
$ grep StrongsPadding= *
bosworthtoller.conf:StrongsPadding=false
eusebian.conf:StrongsPadding=false
mywsc.conf:StrongsPadding=false
zhenglish.conf:StrongsPadding=false
https://wiki.crosswire.org/DevTools:conf_Files#StrongsPadding
StrongsPadding
At the heart of our lexicon/dictionary drivers, we have some old
logic which tries to detect if a key value is a Strong's number, and
if so, then pad it with leading zeros accordingly. To support this
logic, the recognition has recently been added for an optional new
.conf entry for lexicon/dictionary modules:
StrongsPadding=true|false
How "recent" is this addition? Should other modules (Bibles,
commentaries) have it, so as to indicate how its Strongs markup should
be handled?
On its face, this is ambiguous: Is StrongsPadding=true an indication
that the module /has/ padding already, or that it /needs/ padding to be
provided?
_______________________________________________
sword-devel mailing list: [email protected]
http://crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page