Re: Creating a "SWORD-over-network" protocol for remote SWORD repo access?
David Haslam <dfhdfh-g/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.literature.sword.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <OAusyn25ruMrF345ZNyccKQNbFLcDYB-FNWVywil2G5Oae_C35Y5aLJ9NL-OLLlY2lZ6-FyRApocmn817tzcOW2kq4SSMzYrK6TlvII_Rcc=@protonmail.com> |
Worth noting that CrossWire is not the only server hosting SWORD modules! Refer to the relevant wiki page. David On Sat, Jul 13, 2024 at 09:11, Peter von Kaehne <[[email protected]](mailto:On Sat, Jul 13, 2024 at 09:11, Peter von Kaehne <<a href=)> wrote: > You can ask for parts via the study application . I do not think anyone has yet decided to build an app around that. But I see no reason why not. It probably needs dusting off and some further work to make more universally useful, but it is uo and running and always available. > > Sent from [Outlook for iOS](https://aka.ms/o0ukef) > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > From: sword-devel <[email protected]> on behalf of Aaron Rainbolt <[email protected]> > Sent: Saturday, July 13, 2024 5:40 AM > To: SWORD Developers' Collaboration Forum <[email protected]> > Subject: [sword-devel] Creating a "SWORD-over-network" protocol for remote SWORD repo access? > > As it stands, SWORD users face some disadvantages when accessing SWORD > resources - they have to be downloaded in their entirety, installed > onto the end user's system, and then stay there for as long as the > user wishes to access them. While it is possible and even easy to copy > modules from one system to another in theory, the system that views > the modules must still *have* the modules in order to view them. > > Since SWORD already is basically a universal Bible-related data access > system, it seems to me like it could be useful to take the concept one > step further - allowing access to SWORD modules over the network, > where a viewing device must only request the part of a module it wants > to view, and simply discards it when it's done with it. > > Some advantages of this over what SWORD already does: > > * The device used for viewing no longer has to be the device used for > storing the modules. Individuals can stand up a "SWORD server" and > then access the modules from any network-capable SWORD client on any > device. > * The device used for module storage can be located on the Internet, > allowing individuals to access a potentially large library of modules > without installation. > * Assuming a properly secured, encrypted connection can be established > and the server is not obvious as a SWORD server, individuals in > persecuted countries could potentially access SWORD modules over the > Internet, allowing them to access the Bible without leaving a trace on > their devices. > * Organizations with permission to redistribute copyrighted texts > could provide those texts via a SWORD server, allowing them to be > accessed by network-capable SWORD clients (i.e., this could > potentially allow people to legally access texts such as the ESV and > NIV in their favorite SWORD client rather than being forced to resort > to clunky websites, proprietary software, or piracy). Server-side, > open-source DRM measures could be enforced to make downloading entire > modules for offline use more difficult, providing some level of > peace-of-mind to copyright owners. > > Advantages this would have over existing "access the Bible online" solutions: > > * It would provide a standardized interface for accessing the Bible > and Bible-related resources over the Internet, rather than every > project coming up with its own storage conventions and network > protocols. > * People could theoretically use almost any SWORD client to access the > modules, allowing access to the Bible using a native desktop or mobile > application, rather than having to resort to a web browser, clunky > "cross-platform" (read: doesn't work quite right anywhere) app, or a > tracker-laden mess like YouVersion. > * Since the SWORD server itself would essentially be a SWORD client > that provided access to its modules over the network, one SWORD server > could daisy-chain to another one, thus acting as a proxy. This way > small, non-suspicious websites could provide access to major SWORD > servers via a proxy, making it easier to help individuals in > persecuted situations to access the Bible. > * Given the above proxying mechanism, blocking access to SWORD servers > could become very difficult, for much the same reasons why blocking > access to Matrix chat is very difficult. (In a world with unlimited > time and development resources, a full federation system could be > implemented so that anyone could access any module that anyone else > hosted... but that's almost without question overkill and impractical. > Just proxying would be cheap to implement and powerful in use.) > * Anyone could self-host a SWORD server and provide themselves, their > family, their community, or even the world easier access to the Bible > and Bible-related resources. > * Advanced features like fast Lucene search could be provided > server-side, giving a much faster search experience than almost any > modern Web-based Bible application I've used. > * If used alongside a feature like BibleSync, it could be a powerful > tool for churches and Bible studies to use. People could simply > connect to the church's SWORD server and enable BibleSync, then be > able to follow along perfectly with everyone else, with access to the > same resources that their pastor, study leader, etc. is actively > using. No prep work needed (beyond having the proper app installed and > knowing how to point it to the right server). > > In the event this idea is actually worth pursuing, it seems to me like > there would be four things needed to make it a reality. > > * A SWORD network protocol specification. This would probably be the > hardest thing to get right since it has to be gotten right the first > time and then only incrementally updated in the future in a > backwards-compatible manner for best results. > * An actual SWORD server implementation. Once the specification > exists, writing this should theoretically be easy. > * Server access support in the SWORD library itself. This would enable > existing SWORD clients to adopt network support with little effort. > * Adoption of the new feature by SWORD frontends. This of course is up > to (and at the discretion of) each SWORD frontend developer, but if > the SWORD library made accessing network resources act almost > identically to accessing local resources, it would hopefully be easy > to take advantage of the feature, and thus it would hopefully gain > traction. > > So there's my brain-dump of all the reasons I think this is worth > doing and how I think it should be done :P Let me know what you think > and if you have any advice or feedback. This whole thing popped into > my head tonight and I just wanted to share it to see if it's worth > pursuing, or if maybe something similar to this was tried already in > the past. > > Thanks for reading my wall of text. God bless. > _______________________________________________ > sword-devel mailing list: [email protected] > http://crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel > Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page > > _______________________________________________ > sword-devel mailing list: [email protected] > http://crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel > Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page _______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: [email protected] http://crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page