Re: Fwd: Patch for user reporting in HTTP

Mike Bremford wrote:
> Hi Kirk and/or logwatch-patches
> 
> I sent this through a few months back but didn't get a response, and  
> I've just noticed it's not in CVS.

It looks like it didn't get through the mailing list the last time.

>> 1. We need to keep track of who's logging in to our HTTP server  from 
>> where, so I've patched "http" to tot this up in the same way  as for 
>> requests with error response codes.

Two questions:

- Yuo test for status code 401.  Should it consider all non-error
   accesses (status code < 400)?  Or only the successful ones (status
   code >= 200 && status code <300)?

- The term "loggin in" is ambiguous and may infer something else.
   Either "successful accesses" or "non-error accesses" (depending
   on the answer to the first question) may be more suitable.