Re: Cisco service broken in 7.3.6
Mike Tremaine <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.log.logwatch.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hugo van der Kooij wrote: > On Sun, 30 Sep 2007, Mike Tremaine wrote: > >> Hugo van der Kooij wrote: >>> On Sat, 1 Sep 2007, Mike Tremaine wrote: >>> >>>> Hugo van der Kooij wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> Somehow the Cisco code is broken in 7.3.6 as it spews out messages for the >>>>> wrong host. I started to fix the entries that were logged but not matched >>>>> for my Cisco router. But I ended up with unmatched entries that are not >>>>> for that hostname at all. >>>>> >>>>> BTW: It worked much better in 7.3.4 >>>> I think hostname is broken I have fixes in my tree that have not gone >>>> into CVS yet. They are related to the whole --splithosts thing when I >>>> get them in I'll have you pull the cvs version and see if it works as >>>> expected. >>> Did they get into CVS yet? I did a CVS checkout but it seems to contain >>> old files. At least none of them is newer then the files included in the >>> 7.3.6 package. >> PS - You could try uncommenting *OnlyHost in the >> conf/logfiles/cisco.conf file to see if that helps limit to only "hostname". > > Ouch. That works the wrong way around. I only get a load of messages from > the syslog hos which have nothing to do with any Cisco log. But it did not > get anything from the Cisco router I was monitoring. > > The catch and show all part is not supposed in there for generic usage. > The Cisco parsing is incomplete at best. So anyone wanting to track other > lines needs to enable it instead of the current fall through definition. > > A single warning line at the end will tell that unknown events are not > shown. I will write something up and send in a patch along with additions > to cover log lines I get but are not yet parsed. > > Hugo. > I was afraid of that, I had the same issues when I was trying to use the cisco module last year. Post a line or 2 from you cisco logs when you get a chance just so I can have something in front of me as I revisit the onlyhost and hostlist regex. -Mike