Re: [Logwatch] My new server is online

CVS should be working (of course I still haven't actually confirmed that ;)

On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 6:44 AM, Mike Tremaine <[email protected]> wrote:
> Bob Hutchinson wrote:
>> On Tuesday 15 July 2008 08:03, Kirk Bauer wrote:
>>> (resend as I'm pretty sure nobody got the first message)
>>
>> I got both ;-)
>>
>>> It looks like my new server is mostly online, and should be 100%
>>> online with regards to logwatch-related components.  This will
>>> hopefully eliminate the reliability issues I have had for almost 2
>>> months now.
>>>
>>> Can ONE person reply back to the list to let me know you got this
>>> message and can others check the mailing list archives, website, CVS,
>>> FTP, etc?  I have to hit the sack and can't do thorough testing
>>> tonight.  I will resolve any issues tomorrow.
>>>
>>> Once this move is completed and verified I will be able to move the
>>> website to good ol' port 80 for once...
>>>
>>> --
>>> Kirk Bauer <[email protected]>
>>> http://linux.kaybee.org | www.logwatch.org
>>> Author, Automating UNIX & Linux Administration
>>
>
>
> Me three! Let us know when the change from port 81 to port 80 goes off
> [or stick a redirect on 81 back to 80] so we can update the mirroring
> scripts and ofcourse  let me know if/when I can drop the funky domain
> forward.
>
> [PS - CVS shows
>
> [mgt@dwarfstar logwatch]$ cvs update
> Fatal error, aborting.
> logwatch: no such system user
>
> ]
>
> -Mike
>
> _______________________________________________
> Logwatch-Devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www2.list.logwatch.org:81/mailman/listinfo/logwatch-devel
>
>



-- 
Kirk Bauer <[email protected]>
http://linux.kaybee.org | www.logwatch.org
Author, Automating UNIX & Linux Administration