Re: Fwd: patch for scripts/services/postfix: recognize "(n bytes)" after timeouts and lost connections

On Aug 11, 2008, at 7:34 AM, Kirk Bauer wrote:

> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Peter Johnson <[email protected]>
> Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 20:47:43 -0400
> Subject: patch for scripts/services/postfix: recognize "(n bytes)"
> after timeouts and lost connections
> To: [email protected]
>
> Logwatch fails to recognize a ton of messages in my postfix logs,  
> of the form:
>
>     "lost connection after DATA (0 bytes) from unknown[a.b.c.d]"
>
> The attached patch (relative to CVS sync as of 2008-08-10 20:26  
> EST) fixes
> that, and the similar case of "timeout after BLAH (n bytes)".  I  
> feel maximal
> matching is safe here because the line always ends in "from hostname 
> [ip]" and
> the reason always lies between the "after" and the "from".
>
> Thanks.
>
> pete
>
>

Committed to CVS...

-Mike